Side Bars – R.L. Dabney on Secular Conservatives – Rethinking Public Schools – The Bible and Private Property – The Bible and Possession Laws – Deuteronomy 4:5-9 – Lord Acton Quote – The Bible and Gambling – Closing Exhortation – Our Obligations – The Purpose of Civil Government

Ballot Recommendations Summary Measure 54 Measure 55 Measure 56 Measure 57 Measure 58 Measure 59 Measure 60 Measure 61 Measure 62 Measure 63 Measure 64 Measure 65 Measure 66 Measure 67

PEAPAC Information Help Us Expand Get a Political Tax Credit

Measure #57
Makes Possession Of Limited Amount Of Marijuana Class C Misdemeanor

Result of “Yes” vote:
"Yes" vote makes possession of less than one ounce of marijuana a Class C misdemeanor.

Result of “No” vote:
"No" vote retains statute making possession of less than one ounce of marijuana a violation.

PEAPAC Explanation:
This Measure would toughen up the State’s loose marijuana laws. While we have some reservations, we endorse this Measure and recommend a Yes vote.

PEAPAC Commentary and Recommendation

At first glance, this Measure seems worthy of strong support. After all, the Scriptures clearly prohibit drunkenness, which by good and sound reasoning would also apply to getting “high.” Additionally, some theologians would also draw a connection between the sin of witchcraft and the use of various “poisons” or mind-altering drugs, noting the etymology (origins) of the Greek and Hebrew terms used for witchcraft. Drugs are indeed a scourge on our land, and this measure would send a strong signal to the youth of Oregon that the use of this and other such drugs is very serious sin. For these “big picture” reasons, we endorse the Measure.

There are several aspects of this particular Measure which are troubling, however. For instance, it does not seek to punish the improper use of marijuana, but the mere possession of it. We know its hard to come up with a test of “intoxication” for marijuana, but this should be a goal for the future. (See sidebar “The Bible and Possession Laws”)

Also, this particular Measure reflects a growing tendency to use civil penalties in the punishment of crimes. There are cases under this law where a person convicted of possession would lose his driver’s license, even though driving had nothing to do with the offense.

So, this Measure has what we see to be some flaws. But we recommend voting “Yes” and then encouraging the Legislature to clean up the troubling portions of it.

This voters' guide produced by Parents Education Association, PAC.